TORONTO POLICE 14 DIVISION, ABUSE OF POWER AND RACIAL PROFILING.

CONFRONTING POLICE BRUTALITY AND RACIAL PROFILING.

IT IS DANGEROUS TO BE BLACK, AND ALSO AN ACTIVIST. YOU ARE A NATIONAL THREAT, BASED ON THOSE TWO FACTORS.

Toronto Police, 14 Division, Staff Sergeant
Laurie Jackson.

The Face of Corruption.
Involved in a Conspiracy and Cover-up,
regarding, police officers, from her division.
Particularly, involving me. None of the police
officers, from 14 Division, including her, has
ever acted, upon any of my complaint. She was instrumental, in the cover-up, and breach of public trust, regarding the Hugues Idholo case.  The cover-up, of even going so far, as
to change the name of the accused, in order
to protect him. Why? Was he also a paid police informant and working for the police?




ROGUE COPS:

THE TORONTO 14 DIVISION, POLICE OFFICERS, P.C. S. KANE, BADGE # 9504
AND P.C. J. FORCHILLO, BADGE # 90297, REFUSED TO INVESTIGATE COMPLAINT.

"We Are Not Going To Speak To The Person, Or To Investigate Your Complaint". 
"We Know You, You Are The One, Who Said That You Are Going To Speak, To The Staff Sergeant, About Us, Remember?".

And with that the two police officers, from Toronto's 14 Division, On December 7th, then walked off and did not investigate my complaint. They, the police from that division, carry a grudge. But they also do more. They endanger the safety of the public, as well and when it comes to someone like me, who is their frequent target, they mean what they say.  So do I. I mean it when I say that the Toronto police, continual, abuse of my rights, is also something, that I should be compensated for, as far as my civil rights are concerned. Why have they treated me differently? Why can't I contact the police, if I feel that my safety is in danger and have them investigate my complaint about someone? Even to talk to the other person, as part of their investigation, as they also did not do, in this case.

After the comments of the two police officers, the staff sergeant, at the T.O. 14 division police, also did nothing.  Staff sergeant Laurie Jackson, who I also remember talking to, on other occassions and even to the point of asking her, if her division was also carrying out, the illegal surveillance of me, after the ongoing harassment, of the police, from her division.  She said no and in this latest incident
also hung the phone up on me. One police officer, from 14 division, has also said to me, in the past, that, "We have seen your videos and read your stuff". Referring to my frequent, reports about them, on my blog and elsewhere. I feel unsafe and I also feel frustrated. And this is also coming from the police directly. 

I have also read many other accounts, sometimes from other activists, like myself, or even from the
public, about being the target of the police, for whatever reasons and how they've also wondered
what they will do next?  As in even killing you outright, and to cover it up, of course.  Your physical health and also freedom, are at stake.  Because, as a human rights activist, the police also has an agenda, to stop what you are doing. The police has threatened me, intimidated me, and even injured me, physically, before.  In my case, the police campaign against me, is also to humiliate me and when they can, to mock me, openly. They also never cease to try to set me up, using agent provocateurs. No, I'm not exaggerating. It is a fact, that, the Toronto police, has a history of targeting me, personally, both as a black person and also as an activist. I do not have the same rights, as everyone else. I cannot lay a complaint, or file charges against anyone, without either the police, or the courts, also blocking me. That is the reality, that I also have to deal with. I want that to change.

THE UN HAS VOTED TO ALLOW PALESTINIAN STATEHOOD.

CANADA OBJECTS AND THREATENS, RETALIATORY ACTIONS, AGAINST THE PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY, REGARDING, THE UNITED NATION'S DECISION.
John Baird, Canadian Foreign Minister, at the UN General Assembly.

Despite the Canadian government's vehement protest, against the United Nations decision, to make the Palestinian Authority, a non member state, the UN's General Assembly, has voted anyway, to recognized, a Palestinan State, within Israel. The vote 138-9, with 41 members, abstaining, was also passed, despite strong protests, from the three countries, that everyone already knew, would also voted against it. Canada, the United States and Israel, along with a few others.

Canada has threatened to imposed, economic sanctions, against the newly formed Palestinian State, along with other actions, that really comes as no surprise, given its actions in the past. What it wanted was for the Palestinian/Israeli issue, to be dragged out further, which would also not benefit the Palestinian people, but which would definitely benefited the Israeli government, that also has the unconditional, support, of the Canadian government. In fact, Canada has gone on the record, many times, as the official representative, of the Israeli government, and its policies, outside of Israel. Its other close supporter, the United States, which in fact is the real force, behind the Israeli government,
has also supported the Israeli government's actions, against the Palestinian people, despite what it also says, publicly.

The rethoric of the Canadian Foreign Minister, regarding the UN's decision, was also particularly strong, containing threats, and even possible violence, albeit, through the continuation, of the Israeli government's violent actions, against the Palestinian people. Which this government also supports,
wholeheartedly. Baird has commented, that, the Canadian government will consider "all available steps", to deny a Palestinian statehood and that the UN's decision, was also "utterly regrettable". The
Canadian Foreign Minister, also continued with the farce, regarding that country's situation, with Israeli government, claiming that, “The outstanding issues are too intricate and too complex to be resolved by symbolic, unilateral measures"

As I said before, what the Canadian government, actually wanted was a long, dragged out and protracted conflict, of the Palestinian Authority, with the Israeli government, which they could also not win, outright, in their present situation. Not being able to match the Israeli government, in terms of arms, or with the support and I mean the real support, not just a show of it, of other strong nations, who were willing to provide them with the military capabilities, which they so desperately needed, to make this fight, with the Israeli government, an even one.  A fight that is also justified under the circumstances. Now the Palestinian people, has their homeland, as before and must also fight to keep it.


 

UPDATE TO MY CASE BEFORE THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA.

“All victims of human rights abuses should be able to look to the Human Rights Council as a forum and a springboard for action.”
- Ban Ki-moon, UN Secretary-General, 12 March 2007, Opening of the 4th Human Rights Council Session

What is Next? Since the IACHR, has failed to take any precautionary measures, against Canada, on my behalf and also in order to prevent, any further harm to me, by that country, then the United Nations Human Rights Council, must now take precautionary measures, against the Canadian government, to also prevent, the irreparable harm, that is presently being done, by that country, against me.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA'S ATTITUDE TOWARDS MY CASE: WHO CARES ABOUT YOUR URGENT MOTION TO PROTECT YOUR RIGHTS? THE ANSWER IS ALSO SIMPLE, I DO.


On May 30, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada, received the hard copy
of an urgent motion, that I had filed with that court. The S.C.C. already
had my application for leave, in regards to appealing the decision, of
the Court of Appeal for Ontario.

June 1, 2012, I was told that the motion was before the Registrar, and so I had decided, to wait for a written response, from the court.

June 12, 2012, I contacted the Supreme Court of Canada, for an update, in regards to that urgent motion, and was told that there was no information
available, because a decision was also not made, with regard to the matter.


I have now determined that the Supreme Court of Canada, wants to act corruptly, in regards to my case and that is why it has also not made any decisions, with regards to my urgent motion, that was filed on May 30, 2012. Since the Canadian government also has other human rights agencies, such as the IACHR, which also has a petition
that I had filed with the IACHR, against that country, in 2010, also backing its actions, it is also prepared, to continue to act corruptly, regarding my matters before the Canadian courts.

Since Canada was also a member, of the UN Human Rights Council, up until 2009, it will be interesting, to see how the other members, also view its actions, in regards to its persecution of me, presently. I am now prepared to have some of those countries, also intervened, with regards to the present situation, that I am now facing from that government, regarding the abuse of my rights currently.

I know that the process, with the Supreme Court of Canada, is also slow, but it has also acted in a manner, that has also violated, my human rights already. This is where other countries, need to also step in, to make sure that it does not continue to do so. It is also not a stretch of the imagination, as to why Canada, is also no longer a part of the UN Human Rights Council, with its dastardly behaviour, regarding its persecution, of human rights victims, in that country.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA

NEW UPDATES REGARDING MY CASE:

In the interest of justice and of the public, I will continue to report on my case, that is also before, the Supreme Court of Canada, currently.

New information from the Supreme Court of Canada, regarding the urgent
motion, that I had filed on April 11,2012. And what I have been told, by the
S.C.C. office of the Registrar, concerning that motion.

On Monday May 14, 2012, I was told, by the office of the registrar, of the S.C.C. by a telephone message, that was left on my voicemail, that my urgent motion for a stay of execution, of the order of the Court of Appeal for Ontario, on April 4, 2012, "would be presented to Justice Deschamps, this afternoon", of the Supreme Court of Canada, for his decision on the matter. I was also asked to present any other information, that I have regarding the case and send it in by fax, or email.

On Tuesday May 15, 2012, after sending the information, to the Supreme Court of Canada, and after contacting the S.C.C. I was told by a registry officer, that, the manager, Joanne Laniel, in the office of the registrar, has informed her, that the motion, would be heard, by Justice Fish, of the Supreme Court of Canada, on May 15, 2012.

The question that I have asked, since receiving this information, from the S.C.C. is how can the urgent motion, be presented before one judge, Justice Deschamps, on one day, May 14 and to another judge, Justice Fish, the next day? It is also quite obvious, that the motion was also never heard, by Justice Deschamps, on May 14, as I had been told. The Supreme Court of Canada is aware, that I am also following the case, publicly, as well. If what I have been told by the court, so far, is in fact not true, and a lie, perpetrated upon the public, concerning my motion, that is before the S.C.C. and on the part of the office of the registrar.

Wouldn't you also say, that, they have also brought, disrepute, upon the court? I hope for their sake, that they have also been telling me the truth, concerning the matter. That is usually, also, what corruption is, by the way. Personally, I believed, also, that some persons, such as Micheline Alam, Eric Shalom and Joanne Laniel, in the office of the registrar, of the Supreme Court of Canada, has also tried to interfere, personally, with my case, before the S.C.C. and has also tried to cause, undue delay, in the hearing of my urgent motion, before the Supreme Court of Canada.

As the public has been made aware of my case before the Supreme Court of Canada, in which I am appealing the decision of the Court of Appeal, to dismiss my appeal, claiming a lack of jurisdiction, by the Court of Appeal. The Supreme Court of Canada must also now decide, in the interest of the public, if the Court of Appeal for Ontario, had made the right decision, or if it has also violated any of my rights,
under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, through my appeal before the S.C.C.

HUGES IDHOLO, THE MAN WHO WAS CHARGED, ON JULY 9, BY THE POLICE, FOR "THREATENING AN ANIMAL".
THE MAN HAD TRIED, TO MURDER, THE ANIMAL AND ALSO TOLD THE POLICE, OF HIS INTENTION, TO KILL THE ANIMAL.

THE TORONTO POLICE, 14 DIVISION, ALSO DID NOT COMPLY, WITH THE LAW, REGARDING HIS RELEASE.

He was released immediately and without any undertaking, by the police.
The police also knew that his actions involved violence, or threats of violence, including direct statement madet to the police by the accused, of his intentions, to commit a violent act, in this case.

IDHOLO HUGUES, OR HUGUES IDHOLO?

According to the police report, Idholo Hugues, is the right name for this man, who had almost brutally, murdered my animal, on July 9, 2012. I was contesting the name of this man, by the police, from the moment, they had arrested him, on July 9th and one of the arresting officers, also commented, that, "its not what you tell us his name is, it's what he tell us his name is". He is known to use both names, interchangeably.

From the beginning, the police, has also tried to protect him and they are also, proceeding, with their charges against him for threatening to kill an animal, my cat, with the fictitious name of Idholo Hugues, in order to protect this criminal. The man was also in court, at Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, on August 21, 2012 and since then, I've been waiting to get his bail conditions, which for some reason, also, the court cannot find. It has been missing from his file in the court.

I also spoke with these managers, at both the Old City Hall courthouse and College Park court, Susan Nhiem and Pat Mckinnon and they all claimed to be "looking for his bail conditions" and will get back to me about it. When I also reminded them, that, they are also, endangering my safety, and also the safety of the public, by also not providing that document, they've responded, that, they are aware of this and will also try to get that document to me. In a letter from the victim witness program, at Old City Hall, to me, on August 15, also has the accused, Hugues Idholo's name, written as Idholo Hugues. I also share the same address, with this man and also know him, by different names, including Alphonzo and Hugues Idholo Yala.

I have also been able to get the following information about him:
1. He is African national and also from the Repulic of the Congo.
2. He has been living in Canada for 3 years.
3. He has no family, or relatives, living in Canada,
4. He is a single male, 34 years old.
5. He has previously been on welfare, and also under the name, of Hugues Idholo Yala
6. He also currently works as a labourer.
7. He has also been known, to receive, government documents, at his present address, with the name of Hugues Idholo and not Idholo Hugues, as the Toronto police, 14 division, in their corruption, regarding this case, has also claimed.

8. His landlord, also, allegedly, claimed that the room that he has rented, since
November of 2011, he has also done so, using a different name, and in fact, she
did not recognized him, as Hugues Idholo, either.

I will also post a copy, of my letter, from the court, which also shows, his name, on court documents, as Idholo Hugues and not Hugues Idholo. And this may also be, why his bail release document, with the same name, is also "missing" from the court file, currently. One of the managers of that court, Old City Hall courthouse, has also told me, that, she is not sure if the police, had in fact, forwarded, his release conditions, to the court. It turns out that the police had also not entered into any undertakings with the accuses, despite the charge, which also involved violence. The charge that the police laid against the accused is for "threatening an animal' and one would also think that the very act of threatening also involved violence, not withstanding that the accused was also heard on the 911 tape, telling of his intention also to kill the animal. The police also violated the criminal code by also not entering into an undertaking, with the accused, and this is also contrary, to the law. The 14 division police had also released him on a form 10, which is just a promise to appear, in court, and also backed on to the same property, where I also lived, with my animal, that he also tried to kill and also threatened to kill, on July 9, 2012. The fact that the man was also in court, on August 21, also seemed unlikely that the court, also did not have that document, as well.

The Toronto police has claimed, on July 9, that, they also had to hear, the 911 tape first, in which the man, Hugues Idholo, could also be heard, threatening to kill my animal, before they also arrested him. After they had listened to the 911 tape, in their police cruisers, they then took the man, to the police station and released him shortly after wards. I was also told by the police, 14 division, that they had a "discussion" at the station and then decided to release him. Keep in mind that this incident, also involved, a weapon, a knife and the police claimed that they made the right decision, to release the man, Hugues Idholo, in this case. They also disregarded the fact, that, he had also told them directly, that he also intended to kill the animal, both on the 911 tape and also when they were arresting him. The police also release the man, into the same property, as the victims, after his release. His bail conditions is also "missing" from the court file, as well. And also endangering further, the victims safety, in this case.

I believe that both the police and the court, are also working, together, to protect the accused, and also to prevent justice, in this case.

PROTEST AGAINST HARPER'S BILL C-30

WHY DO THE CANADIAN GOVERNMENT, INSIST ON SPYING ONLINE AND TAKING AWAY THE PUBLIC'S RIGHT, TO USE THE INTERNET, UN-OBTRUSIVELY, OR OPENLY, FOR THAT MATTER?.

Vic Toews, Minister of Public Safety and along with Prime Minister Steven Harper, one of the main proponents, of Bill C-30.
There are also calls for his resignation, also in relations to his personal life.


I am talking about the new bill, C-30, that was introduced, recently, by the Canadian parliament, that also has the public in an up roar, because of its broad powers, given to the police, for conducting online surveillance, without even a warrant.

Bill c-30 would now require that the internet providers, along with telephone providers, to also cooperate, with the police and to provide for an infrastructure, where the police could gather information, about anyone of their users, even if they are using an anonymous identity, to the police, for their investigation, or for other purposes. With this access given to the police, they can now monitor the online activities, of all Canadians without their knowledge and to also use this information later, if required, against them.

They claim that it is for catching on line criminals, such as pedophiles and other dangerous criminals, lurking on the internet and also using the telephone, for this purpose. But others who are also concerned with this breach of privacy, by the Canadian government, of those internet users, by the extensive powers that has been given to the police to conduct online surveillance, The internet users and also the internet providers and telephone companies, also has a legitimate reason to be concern, against this possibly breach of civil liberty, by the Canadian government.

It is a net that encompasses everyone and not just criminals alone. It means that anyone and everyone will also be monitored by the police, at their discretion, regardless of whether they have used those means, provided by the internet, for committing a crime, or not. To put it more in proper perspective, the government wants to have the personal information, of all Canadians, who uses the internet and for whatever purposes, good or bad. From your emails, to your blogs and other aspects of the social media, everything that you say or do, in this case, also, pertaining to freedom of speech, will also be monitored, by the Canadian government and its police. So in this case, every Canadian internet users will be monitored and their information provided to the police, when asked for by them.

Once the bill is also passed, it will also be made into law and will also be reflected in the Criminal Code of Canada. The bill is also getting some opposition from some members of parliament as well, including the NDP, and a few other liberal minded politicians. But it also seem set to be passed, although their has also been questions raised, about the way in which those who are in favour of bill c-30, has also tried to side step, some of the usual processes involved, in getting this bill approved. Including referring it back, for full reconsideration, before parliament.

Those who has opposed this measure, has also claimed that the bill was also in its proper form and therefore ready to be passed. However, questions still arise, in regards to this process, by some of the politicians themselves, some of whom also believed that the current bill, is also in violation of the Standing Order 68(1) and 68 (3), both of which also supported a motion, before the bill is to be also passed into law. Never mind all of that, however, those who want this bill enacted, will also see to it, that it does get pass into law and with its passing, also, the eradication of any vestige of privacy, by any Canadians, who also uses the internet, their cell phones and other such services.

Many internet users, such as bloggers and activists, has also long known, about the Canadian government's monitoring, of their movements online, so this is not entirely news to them. But now it also has the law to back up its actions.

CANADA'S REMOVAL, FROM THE UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL.

CANADA'S REMOVAL, FROM THE UNITED NATIONS, HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, WAS ALSO NECESSARY, FOR THE PROTECTION, OF HUMAN RIGHT ABUSE VICTIMS, IN THAT COUNTRY. SINCE 2009, CA NADA'S ROLE, AS A MEMBER, OF THE UNITED NATIONS HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL, WAS NO LONGER ACTIVE.














CANADA HAS COMMITTED THE FOLLOWING ATROCITIES:

Crimes Against Humanity
Torture And Other Acts
The Persecution of Human Rights Activists, Including Some Writers,
and Journalists, Like Myself And Also Abusing Their Human Rights.
Open Racism Against Some Minority Groups.
Corruption In The Canadian Courts, That Has Also Denied, Members of Such
Groups, From Receiving Equal Treatment, From The Canadian Judicial System.

Canada has backed Israel's human rights abuse of the Palestinians.
Canadian Mining Companies, has exploited poor, or developing countries, in
Africa ,Latin America and also elsewhere.
Canada has abused the rights of its First Nations People
Canada has also been operating as a police state, giving broad powers to the police and infringing on those rights, which are also protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, in its Constitution.
Canada has continued to ignore international requests, to also conformed, to
human rights standards, concerning its own country.


Exposing, the Canadian government, human rights abuse, before the world, has not been enough, so far, to also have its expulsion, from international human rights organizations, or from participating among other nations, with regards to those same
human rights organizations. But as a person of conscience, who is also, currently, being persecuted, by that country, I also have the hope that my efforts, to exposed that country's actions, will also pay off in the long run. Already, I have also given it more exposure, than any other so called, human rights organizations, presently, in that country, and where they are also in league, with the actions of that government.

THE CONSPIRACY, SURROUNDING THE CROWN'S, WITDRAWAL, OF THE CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.


On Tuesday, September 25, the accused, Idholo Hugues aka Hugues Idholo Yala, was in court at the Old
City Hall courthouse, inToronto, where he was also facing the criminal charge, of threatening, pertaining to the animal, whose life, he had threatened and also tried to kill back in July.  The charge against him, was also withdrawn by the court, upon the recommendation of the crown.
This happened, also, despite the fact that the crown attorney's office and also the police officer, who was in charge of the case, Robert Monteiro, of the 14 Division precinct, were earlier informed by Patricia Wilson, the manager, of the Victim Witness Programme, on behalf of the victim in this case, regarding the questionable identity, of the accused, which should have also been investigated by them, and also addressed, by the court.  This also did not happen in this case. The police also had direct knowledge, of the accused, using different names, as his legal name, but also did nothing about it.

Then there is also the 911 tape, and what both the crown attorney's office and also the police, also did with that piece of evidence. Where the accused could also be heard, in the background, making his threats to kill the animal, as the victim also called the police. The most damaging piece of evidence, however, was the accused, Idholo Hugues, own self incriminating statements to the police, directly, as he was being arrested
on July 9th, regarding his intentions. "I'm going to kill it, I don't care", he was heard to tell the police. He had also challenged, the owner of the animal earlier, by saying, "bring it, i.e cat, into the kitchen, I am going to kill it right now", as he also took up a knife and advanced towards the victim.  Two other witnesses were also present, as the accused had attacked the victim and also tried to kill her animal and had continued to ranted on about his intentions. What had led up to the attack, was the accused not wanting the animal, on the premises and was also incited, when the victim had washed her cat in the kitchen sink earlier. The victim was talking to the landlord, over the matter, when the accused also attacked her and also attempted to carry out his threats to kill her animal. His chilling words were disregarded by the police, when they also put him back into the same house, as the victims, in this case.

Still the police wanted to be convinced, about the accused actions, so they called in, to listen to the 911 tape at the scene and afterwards they took the accused into custody. They also told the victim after listening to the 911 tape, that it was unlikely that the accused, would be let back into the residence, after his arrest. That also changed at the police station, after they "had a discussion" and the accused was released on his own recognizance, with no undertakings by the police, including the fact that the accused was also free, to continue to have contact with the victim, in this case and to continue to live on the same premesis.

The Toronto police officer, Robert Monteiro, and other officers from the 14 division precinct, also, later fabricated their version, of the events, in their report to the court. This should also not be surprising, because Robert Monteiro, is the same cop, who was also charged, previously, for stealing drugs and money, from dealers, as a part of the now infamous and also defunct, drug squad. Another police officer, associated with this case, Steven Correia, was also just convicted, in June of 2012, for his role as an undercover officer, with the drug squad and where he was also charged and convicted, with the following charges of , assault, theft, perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and extortion. One of the charge that he had also faced, for perjury, was for falsifying his notes and then lying about it later at a preliminary hearing.  He was also previously charged with fraud. So it should also surprised no one, that their old habits, should also resurfaced, with the Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo case. That is what I was up against, and the fact that they been able to work with both the crown and also the court, in this case, in having the charge also withdrawn, against the accused.

CANADA'S HYPOCRITICAL ROLE, WITH THE ICC.

CANADA IS GUILTY, OF CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY.
REVEALING THE CONSPIRACY, OF SILENCE, TO ALSO COVER UP ITS ACTIONS.

Canada was one of those countries, that was instrumental, in working with the ICC, in prosecuting its first criminal case, against a know human rights violator, Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Lubanga was tried and also convicted, as a war criminal, for his role in the use of child soldiers, in his militia group, that was focused on carrying out acts of violence, some of them, including the rape and murder, of innocent civilians.

What the world has been focused on, is the open crimes and human rights abuse, in some countries and not others. When countries such as Canada, that has also carried out act of violence and human rights abuse, is also condoned for its actions, by the international community, then something is also really wrong, with the attitude and also the decisions, of the international community, in deciding which country, or persons in those countries, to also prosecute, for those crimes, that has been carried out, either against an individual, or against groups of people.

Maintaining its role internationally, as a so called "human rights defender", Canada has also been able to avoid, being labeled, as a country that has also carried out, human rights abuse. It also doesn't help the situation, when the human rights organizations, in Canada, has also been to help that country, to cover up its crimes against humanity and to be able to deceive the entire world, about its actions.

The fact is that Canada, has also persecuted, those who has been exposing, its actions, to the rest of the world. Writers, like myself, who are also subjected to the attrocities, that most activists in other countries are also subjected to.

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ANGELO CREMISIO, ACTED DISGRACEFULLY.

Copy of the charge, against the crown attorney, Eliabeth Kozak, that the Justice of the Peace, Angelo Cremisio, claimed that he could also not read.

OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF CORRUPTION AT OLD CITY HALL COURTHOUSE.

PUBLIC PROTEST SCHEDULED AGAINST CORRUPTION AT THAT COURT.

The Justices Of The Peace, At The Old City Hall Court, Has Prevented Criminal Charges Against The Police and Crown Attorneys, At That Court.

Equal Rights, Under The Charter of Rights and Freedoms? Not In This Case.

Justice of the Peace, Angelo Cremisio, has acted corruptly. He has blocked criminal charges, against the Toronto 14 Division police offiers, as well as against two crown attorneys, Ruth Neilson and Elizabeth Kozak, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto. The laying of the private information, by the informant, me, in this case, was also prevented, by all of the justices of the peace, at that court. Including Diane McAleer, Angelo Cremisio and others

He also tried to get the informant to give specific details about the circumstances, surrounding the charges, BEFORE, he would also accept the information. When the informant, refused, he then also refused to lay the information.
The justice of the peace, Angelo Cremisio, also claimed, that, he could also not read the informant's handwriting, yet he also used a yellow highligher, on her infornmation, the informant was also told by the clerk, thereby sabotaging it. He then held on to the original copy, claiming, that it was now a part of the court's record. The inofrmant was then given copies, of her original documents, forcing her to rewrite the information and to file it again. All of this just because he and the other justices of the peace at that court, did not want the informant, to exercise her rights, and to also lay those charges.

If Justice of the Peace Angelo Cremisio, could not read the informant's handwriting, what was he highlighting then? And did he not know, that, by doing so, that, he was in fact, also preventing, the informant, from laying the charges, against them? The informant has to file the information over again? He knew and also acted deliberately. Protests are scheduled to take place, in front of the Old City Hall courthouse, in November.

Justices of the peace, or judges, who do not respect people's rights, under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, should also be removed from their positions.

Court document showing the accused name as Idholo Hugues.



Accused name is shown as Hugues Idholo






 





Crown attorney withdrew the charge and also did not present the 911 tape of the accused threats to the court.





THE POLICE STEPPED UP ITS HARASSMENT.

This morning, as I left my home, an unmarked police car, with a single female inside and wearing dark glasses, drove off, as soon as I began to video tape her, as she sat idly in the car and watching me.  A few

days previous to that, it was a white van, with the windows all shaded out, that was also parked, at the top of street. It was night, so I couldn't see the occupant clearly, until I got up close.  This time it was a guy and as soon as he saw me enter the street where I lived, he too drove off, immediately.  Of course, I still have to put up with the police surveillance, that is also carried out, in marked cruisers and sometimes there are several of them, all at the same time. 

For a while it had stopped, or at least the ones in the marked police vehicles, but started up again some weeks ago.  That I could also plainly identify, as definitely watching me.  Somehow the idea of being video taped, also does not appealled to them, for they will always, immediately, drive off.

The police has also stepped up its harassment, through its agent provocateurs, who has also been increasing their attacks against me. The court, last week, has also blocked my charges against them, as well as the police. I am pressing for other media, to take up this story, as well, because I am also convinced, that, some of those persons, who has been working, with the Toronto 14 division police, in this case, should also be investigated further. Since that police division, has also blocked, all investigations and charges against them. It is a major cover-up, that also need more exposure more in the media.

POLICE ENTRAPEMENT: THE DANGER POSED TO ACTIVISTS.

I once wrote an article entitled "Confronting State Terror", which was about the actions of the Canadian government, in its persecution, of both individuals, as well as groups of people.  I even handed a copy of that article to a Canadian government intelligence officer, one time, who was also quizzing me, on something else, unrelated to that topic.  I think she visibly gulped when I handed it to her. It was plain what my view were on some issues and I didn't see no point in hiding them.  Being outspoken also comes with a cost. It means living a life, under daily surveillance and being subjected to entrapment by the police and the government. And all for what? People who are less outspoken than me, may get around that, but I truly believe, that Canada, has become a police state. And also using the methods of a totalitarian and autocratic government.  I also resent being put into a situation by the police where my safety and freedom are also endangered, by the actions of the police and the government, working together to silence me. Each time I am also reminded that this is also based on who I am. A member of a visible minority, living in a country, that also does not recognized such a person, as a being legitimate member of this society. The human rights abuse component, of this issue, has also compounded the problem for me, as well.
Police entrapment should be regarded as a crime in and of itself, by the police and by those who has used this method to ensnare others. The police has used entrapment and often with the aid of agent provocateurs, in their service, to try and ensare ordinary citizens, into committing crimes, that they normally would not have committed, under those circumstances.  The police targerts are also sometimes not the usual criminals, who are also inclined to commit those actions anyway, but usually those who has come under radar, of either the police, or the government and who the police has also accused of carrying out subversive actions, against the government, that they also feel by their actions, are also made justifiable, in trying to get those persons to commit a crime, through deception and other means.
This is a reality that I have also lived with from the Toronto police and also the government of Canada.
If you've read some of my most recent articles, you will also see why, when those who I also believed are agent provocateurs of the police, are also given unusual protection by them and to also continue to act for them with immunity. Where I am living right now there are two such persons, that I also believed are agents of the police and of the Canadian government, against me, whose role is to create situations that would cause me to commit a crime. What is also schocking about those persons as well, is the fact that they are also in other ways, believed to have committed other crimes. For instance, by being illegally in Canada, or has committed a criminal offence while living in Canada, without having any official legal status. The Hugues Idholo case, is also one example of this. The other case, involving the woman, Yu Xia Li, who is also believed to be, allegedly, living in Canada illegally, is another.  In the Hugues Idholo case, with no evidence of having any legal status, whatsoever, except maybe those that would apply to a conventional refugee applicant in this case, which is also limited, there are still no proof that he is either a conventional refugee, a landed immigrant, or Canadian citizen. And with the other person, Yu Xia Li, there is no evidence, whatsoever, of her having any kind of legal status, including, those under the refugee protection provisions of the law.  This should show the depth of the problem with the police and other government authorities, regarding those persons and others like them, that they have also commissioned, to act for them, to "take down" their select targets.

When entrapment by the police is proven in a court of law, it is also the basis for the acquittal of the case. The fact that the police will not take any actions against those persons and where evidence has also shown them to have broken the law, otherwise, is a clear case of the police working clandestinely with them also.  Some of the things that they have done are also very subtle and one has to really study their actions, to see the motives behind some of their actions and also the police involvement with them behind the scene. But there is also more regarding those actions. The police I believed has helped to cover up other investigations against them. Some of which I have also disclosed here on my blog.

For example, going out of their way, to try and cause the person to act, or to react to some of their actions. All of which are in themselves criminal and for which they could also be charged. The police chose to regard it as a dispute between the parties. The difference in this case, is where one of the party, is also believed to be an unwilling participant, to all of this and would also preferred, to be left alone, or out of it entirely. This tactic of entrapment by the police, also has a psycological aspect to it. And the police intention is to continue to "apply pressure" until the target eitther snaps, or do something, that would also make them fall into their hands. In which case they would have also accomplished their purpose.  
So I have decided to turn the tables on them. I decided that the law is on my side at this time and not theirs and that I will also use this against them, should I be cognizant of any actions of theirs, that I believed, is either criminal, or that should also be investigated, and which is also not being done at this time and that will also be done, in the interest of the public, and despite the police actions to protect those persons.  Therefore attempts by them, and others to entrap me, will also be reversed, where it is I who will be laying the charges, for any infringement of my rights, by them, either through the criminal code, or by other means available to me, under the law. Where they want me to act aggressive, I will act assertive and I will indeed, ascertain my legal rights here, against them. I will not fall victim to this kind of abuse by the police. I am fairly educated enough and also know the law well enough, to know that I also do not have to go along with their ploy, like a sheep to the slaughter.  It is a form of human rights abuse, because it also prevents the person from being able to live a normal life, or to have the enjoyments of such a life.

911 TAPE TO BE EDITED BY THE POLICE. THE ACCUSED DEATH THREATS, TO THE VICTIM, CONCERNING HER ANIMAL, TO BE EDITED, OUT OF THE 911 TAPE, ACCORDING TO THE POLICE.

The Police's  claim, To Removed, A Crucial Piece Of Evidence, From The 911 Tape,  Is Also To Be Appealed.

TORONTO POLICE ACCESS AND PRIVACY: "We Cannot Release The Tape 911 Tape, With The Accused Comments, It Will Be Edited Out, To Protect His Privacy"

WHAT ABOUT PROTECTING THE INTEREST OF THE PUBLIC?

If the public is wondering, why, the 911 tape of the victim's call, to the police, on July 9, 2012
which also included the accused comments, as well, specifically, his threats to kill, or to injure someone, or an animal. The police has decided to edit that portion out of the 911 tape.

They have the nerve to tell the victim, that, she also needed the accused written permission, to have his comments, of his death threats to the victim, included in the 911 tape, otherwise it will be edited out. "To protect his privacy"!  This, according to the manager, of the access and  privacy department, Katie Watts, on October 24th, at the Toronto Police headquarters, and also to the victim in this case, Valerie Guillaume, who had requested the 911 tape.  Releasing the 911 tape of Hugues Idholo's statements, of his death threats, would also be a violation of his privacy, the police is claiming.  Is it just me, that thinks that there is something wrong here? regarding the police's statement?

The key to getting a conviction, against the man, Hugues Idholo, was also the self incrininating statements, that he also made, that was caught on the 911 tape, during the victim's call to the police. If the police edits it out, as they say, that they will also do, in order to protect his privacy, then that evidence is also lost.  The victim was also told by the Access and Privacy Commission, that, should the police, not provide the full 911 tape, their decision, to edit the tape, can also be appealed.

But the public is left wondering why the police would also make such a decision in the first place?. If someone is caught in the very act of committing a crime, such as making a death threat, does the police then have the right, to remove that evidence, if it was caught on a tape, as was the case with the Hugues Idholo case?.  Isn't that's what is also needed for a conviction? The accused own self incriminating statements?  Doesn't the police have a responsibility, also, to protect the interest of the public and not the person, who has committed the crime, in this case?

There is also no copy of the 911 tape of the accused comments, with the court either. The police claim that they had also provided, a copy of the 911 tape, to the court and this is also not true, since there is no copy of such a tape in any of the court's record office. The exhibit office, of the court, for instance, has no copy of the 911 tape, and has never recieved any according to them, from the crown attorney's office. The 911 tape would have also been a crucial piece of evidence against the accused, at a trial. Both the crown attorney's office and also the police has kept this piece of evidence, from the court.

Accordingly, both the police's disclosure and also the crown's brief, if you can also believe this lie, about the crown attorney's personal notes, being given directly to the police, in regards to the case, that were also sent back to the police and the police is now saying, that, they can only release, an edited version, of the 911 tape, that would also not include, the accused own comments, that was also caught on the 911 tape. The self incriminating statements, of his death threats, to kill the animal of the victim. And to also attempt to get away with his actions. Both the police and the crown attorney's office, also made sure of that, after withdrawing the charge, against the accused, Hugues Idholo. The victim also received, no apology, contrary to what the police has also claimed, to be a part of the condition, of withdrawing the charge and for him to also attend anger management. Neither of which he has also apparently done, in this case.

The man is apparently also trying to achieved some kind of status, in Canada, despite his violent nature. A condition which would also disqualify him from remaining in Canada. Obtaining landed immigrant status in Canada, is also somewhat of a long process, which is intented, to exposed those who may also break the law, during that time. There is no more convinving evidence against him, than his own violent actions in this case, regarding his death threats to the victim, to kill her animal and where he has also shown no remorse, whatsoever, for doing so.  And which the police is also trying to cover up, or to prevent, from hindering this process. There is also his other actions, of using different identities, to suit whatever other purpose he also wants to achieve, at that moment and with the police also going along with it, even to the point of trying to decieved the court, regarding that, directly. But what about the victim in this case and also the police legal obligation to uphold the law?

The police is also trying to make a mockery, of justice in this case and there is also no other recourse, left to the victim, but to appeal the police's decision, to edit the 911 tape, containing the evidence against the accused. And also to put public pressure on the police, to release the full tape, of both the victim and the accused statements, in this case.

THE TORONTO POLICE, ARE ACCUSED, OF WORKING WITH ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS , WHO ALSO ACT AS AGENT PROVOCATEURS.

Woman, believed to be Yu Xia Li and also illegally in Canada. She is also accused, of endangering, the safety of the public.

LANDLORD IS ACCUSED OF ALLOWING ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS TO OCCUPY PREMESIS.

Li Yong Yu, is the owner of the property located at 87 Argyle street, in Toronto and she is also being accused, of harbouring people, who are also believed to be illegally in the country, including, members of her own family, on the property.

She is also being investigated, by the city of Toronto, for other violations, including for possibly breaching the zoning by law, and other infractions, regarding the building.

The Toronto police, 14 division, has been accused of working with those same people, it is also believed, who they also know to be illegally, in the country and has also been using them, to act as agent provocateurs.  This is the shocking revelation that is now coming to forth, after the police also refused to act, upon information, to investigate those same persons, after they were also being investigated, for endangering the safety of others, while already breaking the law, for allegedly, being here illegally.

The two persons at the center of the controversey, are Hugues Idholo Yala, who is also believed to be applying for refugee status and after he was also charged with a violent offence!, while in Canada.  The second person, also at the center of this story, is a woman that is also believed, to go by the name of Yu Xia Li, the sister of the owner of the building.  She currently lives at 87 Argyle street, in Toronto and she is also believed to be illegally in the country and that this is also known to the police, the Toronto 14 division police to be exact, but that they have also not acted upon it, though they have been known to attend the property, many times, to investigate their actions, including within the last week, when they were both accused, of causing a fire hazard, by putting oil on the stove, deliberately and for which the fire department, is also investigating.  That was what got them into trouble, recently. And if it was also left up to the police, they would also cover it up entirely. 

It is bad enough that there are allegations, against them for being in Canada illegally, but endangering the safety of the public, at the same time, is also what has caused me, to regard this matter, as being of public concern and to also make this information public. By making those allegations about them public, I  hope to force the Canadian authorities, to act to protect the safety of the public. It is another blow to the corruption, that might also be underneath it all and why they don't want to act, in this case. 

A View of the Canadian System.
Canada Deports Those Who Saves Lives and Keep Those Who Endanger It.

On the other hand, another person, who has claimed to help the police to solve many unsolved murder cases and to help put those murderers behind bars, was also recently deported from Canada.  She has called herself the 'snitch lady' and has personally claimed to help put at least 13 persons, in prison, for committing murders, as well as other serious crimes.  Kemi Omolulu Olunloyo, was deported back to Nigeria, after her refugee application was denied, by the Immigration and Refugee Board.  Some people, like me, also believed, that, she was deported to save  her own life, maybe?. Since putting murderers behind bar, is also a highly dangerous job.  Kemi Omolulu Olunloyo, has also actually said that much, too, when she described her departure, as being a "covert operation" and "that she was given the VIP treatment". Still, Canada acted treaterously, by deporting, someone who actually made society safer, albeit, acting stupidly herself.
It is a tactic that it has used many times.  I once know a woman who was deported back to Central America, after cooperating with CSIS and the police here, and who also ratted out on some drug dealers, back in her own country, in retrurn for having status in Canada. She was later deported back to the very same country, to face those persons, she had betrayed to the Canadian authorities.  That is how the Canadian government operate. I feel sorry for none of them, with the exception, of one of those cases. The Omar Khadar case. After obtaining, whatever information, that it could, from the boy, Omar Khadar, CSIS then turn around and handed him over to the United States government, where he was later tortured some more and detained. 

Many people are also aware, that, Canada is a haven for criminals and when I also discovered, that, the Toronto police, 14 division, and also others, including the government, directly and also the court, were actually working, with those who are also believed, to have committed a crime, in some way, I had to report it, like I did here, regarding the Li Xia Yu and the Idholo Hugues cases. Simply because it is also corruption.

THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA MAKES DECISION TO DISMISS MY APPEAL.

5 MONTHS AFTER MY 'URGENT MOTION' TO THE SUPREME COURT OF CANDA, IT
HAS FINALLY MADE ITS DECISION, REGARDING THAT MOTION AND ALSO TO DISMISS MY APPEAL. AT THE SAME TIME, IT HAS ALSO GRANTED, THE RESPONDENTS, THE RIGHT TO SERVE ME, BY SUBSTITUTED SERVICE, REGARDING THEIR OWN MOTION, THAT WAS ALSO FILED, SUPPOSEDLY, IN MAY, OF 2012.

On September 27, 2012, the Supreme Court of Canada, made an order, regarding my appeal , as well as regarding my 'urgent motion', that was also before that court, six months after they were both filed, with the S.C.C, to dismiss both the urgent motion, which it also ignored for five months and also my appeal, and at the same time, to also grant to the respondents, their request, in regards to their own motion, that was also filed, supposedly, at the same time, though I was also never served, with any documents. The Supreme Court of Canada also, deliberately, took no actions, to protect my rights, while my appeal, was also before the court. 
The case involved whether the respondents, managers of my coop, which also does not fall under the Residential Tenancies Act, had the right to dispute my application, in the Ontario Court of Appeal, where I had filed my appeal, based on the jurisdiction of that court. The court of Appeal then later claimed, that the Divisional court, was the 'right' court, to hear the appeal and so refuses to hear the case. The Divisional court, based on its own jurisdiction, only deals with matters involving 'errors of law' only and not those involving, errors of both law and fact. TThe Court of Appeal's decision to dismiss the case, was then appealed toe the Supreme Court of Canada.

While the case was also before the Supreme Court of Canada, including the motion for a stay of execution, that was also pending before the S.C.C, the respondents also acted with the Sheriff's office, to carry out an illegal writ of possession, regarding my home. The Supreme Court of Canada, also remained silent on the matter, despite my urgentt motion,  for it to act to protect my rights, while it also decided on my appeal.
Canada 's so called 'highest court' also refuses to do so and for five months I also waited for a decision, on that motion, while I was left with just the clothes on my back, after the illegal actions, that was also carried out, by the respondents and the Sheriff's office, against me. I was left with nothing, basically, while they also removed the contents of my home and changed the lock on the door.  The Supreme Court of Canada, still took no actions to protect my rights, while it also decided on the case. We know that the actions of the Sheriff and also the respondents, were illegal, because the law is also very clear on that.  It basically stays, under the Court of Justice Act, the actions of a third party, such as a Sheriff, while a motion or an appeal, is also pending before the court. 

Somehow, that law didn't apply to me and the Supreme Court of Canada, based on its own actions, also agreed. The Supreme Court of Canada Act, also, supposedly, stays such as action, as well, but again, not when it comes to me.  The overall conspiracy, was also very evident, regarding the actions of the Canadian courts, and the others involved. It is now left up to me to seek damages against their actions, but this is also unlikely in any Canadian court. So both my civil and also my crimainal charges against those responsible, will also continue in the international court, where I also hope to be outside of the influence, of the Canadian government and its persecution of me, as an individual.

"Canada trying to exterminate aboriginals", former chief says.

Aboriginal leader blasts Canada for human rights violations

Native Leaders In Iran, To Get Support Against Canada's Human Rights
Abuses, Against The Aboriginal People.

"CANADA TRYING TO EXTERMINATE ABORIGINALS", SAYS TERRY NELSON,
CANADA'S  FIRST NATION CHIEF.

Canada's Aboriginal Leaders, Terry Nelson and Denis Pashe, are in Iran,
where they have accused, the Canadian Government, of Human Rights Abuse,
against the Aboriginal people. They have accused Canada, of having "concentration camps"
regarding its Indian reservations and also of that country's efforts, to "wipe out the
aboriginal people, of Canada".

The two First Nations Chiefs, also talks about the "mass graves of the First Nations children, who were murdered, as part of the residential school program" and "That has been covered up by the current Harper administration, Harper government and I do not call it the government of Canada, in fact, the Harper government calls it the Harper government, not the government of Canada".  This was also directly refering to the missing 600 Aboriginal women, who were also ignored by the Canadian government, and which the Native Chiefs, has regarded as an attempt to commit genocide, against the Aboriginal people.  According to Denis Pashe, the former chief of the Dakota Tipi First Nation, “It’s part of the ongoing effort by the Canadian government to exterminate us,”  and “We are a race of people who are endangered.”

The Manitoba, Reseau River Chief, Terry Nelson, also says, that, "We have tried very hard to open up human rights issues and we have sent lots of documentations at various embassies..." “The Iranian Embassy was the only embassy to respond". 

The Iranian television, which was also sympathetic, to the case of Canada's human rights abuse, also took up the claims against the Canadian government, much to the relief, of both the First Nations Chiefs, and also on behalf of other human rights abuse victims, currently, in Canada. The Iranian article, also refers to  "THE OTHER BLACK MARKS" in Canada's human rights abuse record, as well. "The widespread human rights violations in Canada go unnoticed in the West as Ottawa’s allies turn a blind eye to the issue".

I say, that it is high time, also, that the world should finally sit up and take notice, of the Canadian government's human rights abuse and other crimes against humanity. It is also a case of the 'chicken coming home to roost', so to speak. Canada has long pointed the finger, at the Iranian government's human rights abuse, while trying to maintain its own innocence. It is of course a lie and now the world, has been given a more truthful version, of its actions, by the two First Nations chiefs, concerning its disregard, for human rights, in its own country.  Sadly, they have also been ridiculed and maligned, in the Canadian press,, which are pro government and also further exist, to extend, the reign of terror, by the Canadian government, against certian people living in that country.  The First Nations people, Blacks and anybody else, that the Canadian government, also chose to target and to abuse their human rights.

THE OUTRAGEOUS ACTIONS, OF THE TORONTO 14 DIVISION POLICE.

Two weeks after the charges against the accused, Hugues Idholo was withdrawn, due to the corruption, by the police, the crown attorney and the court, the police has contacted the victim, on Thanksgiving Day, to tell her about the case and also claiming, that, the accused was to also write her a letter, of apology, as part of the deal, which has also not materialized, for his charges being withdrawn.  That is their version of the events, but the victim, in this case, would also like to see, all of them, answer to the public, for this corruption, as well.

Part Two:

When the police was called, recently, about the man Huges Idholo and another occupant, who is also believed, to be the sister, of the owner of the building, allegedly setting off the smoke alarm, by putting oil, intentionally, on the burner of the stove, two rogue cops, from the Toronto 14 division police, showed up and insted of doing an investigation, actually gave him the 'high five'.  They also commented, that, he did not have to speak, to the police, about the incident and send him off on his way.  The fire department, however, has also taken the complaint, of what appeared to be mischief, on his part, more seriously and is also investigating, the incident.  Since having the charges against him withdrawn, the man has been acting really brazen, believing that he can get away with anything.  He has even told the victim, who the police has also claimed, he was to write an apology letter to, but which she has also never received, either from him, or from the court, that, "the police won't arrest him and that she was a loser".

My take on that comment, is that the man also need to see, beyond his peripheral vision, because if I remember, correctly, he is also facing other charges, regarding the victim. The charges of assault with a weapon, uttering death threats and threatening to kill an animal, are not charges that should be taken lightly. One police officer, did called the accused, "an idiot" and I can also see why.

Toronto - The Crown Attorney's Office, Withheld The 911 Tape Evidence.

The date of this interview is October 9, 2012.

The Toronto Police and The Court Corruption Regarding the Hugues Idholo ...

October 4, 2012.
"You cannot view the file". says the clerk, in the court support office, at the Old City Hall Court, in Toronto. Her manager, also agreed and brought back a one page doc. that she also claimed, was all that the file contained. At the left hand corner of the document, can be seen a staple, where  the said document, was obviously attached, to another one. I was told by a lawyer, who was close by, that the accused arrest record, would've  been attached to it, but it was definitely removed, by the court clerk.
Excuse me, also, but that is public record now.

The Hugues Idholo Case: The Missing File, From The Office of the Justice of the Peace..

October 4, 2012
The private information, against the accused, Hugues Idholo Yala, is also missing, from the office, of the Justice of the Peace. And the entire court record of the accused, also consist of a one page document. Missing from the court file, is also the 911 tape and other evidence, that are also crucial, in the prosecution of this man. The police did their job, thoroughly, in trying to protect, one of their agent, in this case, I also believe.  But the case is not over yet.

CROWN WITHDREW CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED, IDHOLO HUGUES.

THE CONSPIRACY, SURROUNDING THE CROWN'S, WITDRAWAL, OF THE CHARGES, AGAINST THE ACCUSED.


On Tuesday, September 25, the accused, Idholo Hugues aka Hugues Idholo Yala, was in court at the Old
City Hall courthouse, inToronto, where he was also facing the criminal charge, of threatening, pertaining to the animal, whose life, he had threatened and also tried to kill back in July.  The charge against him, was also withdrawn by the court, upon the recommendation of the crown.  A few days earlier, on September 20, the same court, had also not proceeded, with the private charges, that were also laid against the accused, by the victim, in this case.
This has happened, also, despite the fact that the crown attorney's office and also the police officer, who was in charge of the case, Robert Monteiro, of the 14 Division precinct, were earlier informed by Patricia Wilson, the manager, of the Victim Witness Programme, on behalf of the victim in this case, regarding the questionable identity, of the accused, which should have also been investigated by them, and also addressed, by the court.  This also did not happen in this case. The police also had direct knowledge, of the accused, using different names, as his legal name, but also did nothing about it. 

Then there is also the 911 tape, and what both the crown attorney's office and also the police, also did with that piece of evidence. Where the accused could also be heard, in the background, making his threats to kill the animal, as the victim also called the police. The most damaging piece of evidence, however, was the accused, Idholo Hugues, own self incriminating statements to the police, directly, as he was being arrested
on July 9th, regarding his intentions. "I'm going to kill it, I don't care", he was heard to tell the police. He had also challenged, the owner of the animal earlier, by saying, "bring it, i.e cat, into the kitchen, I am going to kill it right now", as he also took up a knife and advanced towards the victim.  Two other witnesses were also present, as the accused had attacked the victim and also tried to kill her animal and had continued to ranted on about his intentions. What had led up to the attack, was the accused not wanting the animal, on the premises and was also incited, when the victim had washed her cat in the kitchen sink earlier. The victim was talking to the landlord, over the matter, when the accused also attacked her and also attempted to carry out his threats to kill her animal. His chilling words were disregarded by the police, when they also put him back into the same house, as the victims, in this case.

Still the police wanted to be convinced, about the accused actions, so they called in, to listen to the 911 tape at the scene and afterwards they took the accused into custody. They also told the victim after listening to the 911 tape, that it was unlikely that the accused, would be let back into the residence, after his arrest. That also changed at the police station, after they "had a discussion" and the accused was released on his own recognizance, with no undertakings by the police, including the fact that the accused was also free, to continue to have contact with the victim, in this case and to continue to live on the same premesis.

The Toronto police officer, Robert Monteiro, and other officers from the 14 division precinct, also, later fabricated their version, of the events, in their report to the court. Another police officer, from 14 division, Steven Correia, who also told the lie, that he was the staff sergeant, when he was asked to put a call through to the staff sergeant on duty, was also just convicted, in June of 2012, for his role as an undercover officer, with the drug squad, and where he was also charged and convicted, with the following charges of , assault, theft, perjury, conspiracy to obstruct justice and extortion. One of the charge that he had also faced, for perjury, was for falsifying his notes and then lying about it later, at a preliminary hearing.  He was also previously charged with fraud. So it should also surprised no one, that their old habits, should also resurfaced, with the Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo case. That is what I was up against, and the fact that they have been able to work with both the crown attorney's office and also the court, in having the charge withdrawn, against the accused, is also a testimony to this fact. It is also clear that the accused, Idholo Hugues, aka Hugues Idholo Yala, has some "special" relationship, with the police and for which they're also willing, to go all out to protect him. I, of course, knows what that relationship is, since he has been able to avoid being prosecuted, for what amounts to be a crime against the public, including for what appears to be fraud, in regards to his different identities. I am trying to get my hands on the 911 tape, as well as other court documents, that should also be available to the public, to also prove my point, about him and also about this case. This case is also not going to go away anytime soon. After the full evidence has also come out, about the accused, then the public can also decide on how they have acted corruptly, in this case.

T.O. POLICE, 14 DIVISION, CONTROVERSIAL DECISION, IN THE HUGUES IDHOLO CASE, CAUGHT ON TAPE.

PATRICIA WILSON, OF THE VICTIM WITNESS ASSISTANCE PROGRAM, COMMENTS, RE: 14 DIVISION POLICE. THE COMMENTS ARE BASED, ON THE SCANDALOUS ACTIONS, OF THE POLICE, IN THE ARREST OF THE ACCUSED, HUGUES IDHOLO, AKA IDHOLO HUGUES, IN THE JULY 9th, INCIDENT AND ALSO THREATENING CHARGE, AGAINST HIM. THE ACCUSED, HAD ALSO UTTERED, DEATH THREATS, IN THIS CASE.

THE ACCUSED, HUGUES IDHOLO, AKA IDHOLO HUGUES.


In this video, the police, has left it up to a civilian, in this case, the landlord of the accused, to put any restrictions, on him.

The accused is also suspected of committing identity fraud.
Among the different Canadian government agencies, that he has used the name of 'Hugues Idholo', includes, Ministry of Social Services (Toronto), or welfare, the CIBC bank (Toronto), Canada Revenue Agency, the company KELLY services, PLAN and others. Who has the more compelling information about him? I chose to believe the other government agencies and the bank, over the police, at this time. The police also has more than enough reason, to lie, regarding the accused and in fact, has lied, in their court documents, regarding the case. This is corruption and has also led to charges, against the police themselves, in this case. Human Rights protection, means that the police, should have protected, the safety of the public first, and not put their own interest first. Those documented evidence, has also refuted the police claim, about the name of the accused, being 'Idholo Hugues'. The court, of course, cannot ignore such evidence, as the police also did, in this case. Basically, in the case of the accused, regarding the aliases, he has used, which has also included, using different names, for the same address, and with those other government agencies and private companies, or the bank, besides the one he has been charged under. What else could this be more than fraud?. This is a person, who is also new in the country and has already established himself, in the most violent way. And the police is also trying, to prevent him, from being penalized for it.

HUGES IDHOLO, THE MAN WHO WAS CHARGED, ON JULY 9, BY THE POLICE, FOR "THREATENING AN ANIMAL".

THE MAN HAD TRIED, TO MURDER, THE ANIMAL AND ALSO TOLD THE POLICE, OF HIS INTENTION, TO KILL THE ANIMAL.

Can You Help To Identify This Man?.


IDHOLO HUGUES, OR HUGUES IDHOLO?





THE POLICE COVER-UP

According to the police, Idholo Hugues, is the right name for the man, who had almost brutally, murdered my animal, on July 9, 2012. I was also contesting, the name, of this man, by the police, from the moment, that, they had arrested him, on July 9th and one of the arresting officers, also commented, that, "its not what you tell us his name is, it's what he tell us his name is". He is known to use both names, interchangeably.

From the beginning, the police, has also tried to protect him and they are also, proceeding, with their minor charge against him, for 'threatening an animal', my cat in this case, with the fictitious name, of Idholo Hugues, in order to protect this criminal. The man was also in court, at Old City Hall courthouse, in Toronto, on August 21, 2012 and since then, I've also been waiting to get his bail conditions, which for some reason, also, the court cannot find. It has been missing from his file in the court, I had also been told, by Tracy Clark, Manager, with the Victim Witness Program, at Old City Hall court, in Toronto.

I also spoke with these managers, at both the Old City Hall Court and College Park Court, in Toronto, Susan Nhiem and Pat Mckinnon and they all claimed, to be "looking for his bail conditions" and will also get back to me about it. When I also reminded them, that, they are also, endangering my safety, and also the safety of the public, by also not providing that document, they've responded, that, they are aware of this and will also try to get that document to me. The document in question, a copy of the release conditions, of the accused, also do not exist. I was later told by them, that, the police had also not entered, into any undertakings, with the accused, in this case. I was specifically told that the police, had "left it to his landlord", to impose any restrictions on him, as far as him remaining in the same property, where I also live. In fact, that specific statement was also left on my voice message, by the manager, Patricia Wilson, with the Ministry of Attorney General, Victim Witness Program.

In a letter from the victim witness program, at Old City Hall, to me, on August 15, also has the accused, Hugues Idholo's name, written as Idholo Hugues. I also share the same address, with this man and also know him, by different names, including Alphonzo and Hugues Idholo Yala.

I have also been able to get the following information about him:
1. He is African and also from the Congo.
2. He has been living in Canada for 3 years.
3. He has no family, or relatives, living in Canada,
4. He is a single male, 34 years old.
5. He has previously been on welfare, and also under the name, of Hugues Idholo Yala
6. He also currently works as a labourer.
7. He has also been known, to receive, government documents, or letters, at his present address, from such government agencies as Canada Revenue Agency and Ontarion Works (Welfare), with the name of Hugues Idholo, or Hugues Idholo Yala and not Idholo Hugues, as the Toronto police, 14 division, in their corruption, regarding this case, has also claimed.

8. His landlord, has also, allegedly, claimed that the room, that he has rented, since November of 2011, he has also done so, using a different name, and in fact, she also did not recognized him, as Hugues Idholo, either.

The Toronto police has claimed, on July 9, that, they also had to hear, the 911 tape first, in which the man, Hugues Idholo, could also be heard, threatening to kill my animal, before they also arrested him. After they had listened to the 911 tape, in their police cruisers, they then took the man, to the police station and released him shortly after wards. I was also told by the police, 14 division, that they had a "discussion" at the station and then decided to release him. Keep in mind that this incident, also involved, a weapon, a knife and the police claimed that they made the right decision, to release the man, Hugues Idholo, in this case. They also disregarded the fact, that, he had also told them directly, that he also intended to kill the animal, both on the 911 tape and also when they were arresting him. The police also release the man, into the same property, as the victims, after his release. His bail conditions is also "missing" from the court file, as well. And also endangering further, the victims safety, in this case.

It turns out that the police had also not entered into any undertakings with the accused, despite the charge, which also involved violence. The charge that the police has laid, against the accused, is only for "threatening an animal' and not 'threatening to kill an animal'. One would also think, that, the very act of threatening, also involved violence. The accused was also heard, on the 911 tape, telling of his intention, to also to kill the animal. The police also violated the law, by also not entering into an undertaking with the accused. The 14 division police, had also released him, on a form 10, which is just a promise to appear, in court and he was also released, backed onto the same property, where the victim also lives. The police did not see his actions, which also involved a knife, as being a public safety issue, in this case. The fact that the man was also in court, on August 21, also seemed unlikely, that, the court also did not have, a copy of his release document, by the police on July 9, 2012, which the judge, or justice of the peace, is also required by law, to view and also act upon.

I believe that both the police and the court, are also working, together, to protect the accused, and also to prevent justice, in this case.

THE TORONTO POLICE, 14 DIVISION, ALSO DID NOT COMPLY, WITH THE LAW, REGARDING HIS RELEASE.
1. He was released without any undertakings, by the police, although the police also knew, that, his actions also involved, violence, or threats of violence, including his direct statement, to the police, of his intention, to commit a violent act, in this case.

2. The police did not positively identified the man, since he is also known to use different aliases. The police may have also arrested him and also prosecuted him, with the intention, os using a ficticious name, to prosecute him, in order to protect his true identity. And what that also means, for the safety of the victim and the public, in this case.

3. So far, we know that the following government agencies, Canada Revenue Agency, Ministry of Social Services, and also the CIBC Bank and others, all has information, on the accused, which also identified him, not as Idholo Hugues, as the police also suggested, but as Hugues Idholo, or Hugues Idholo Yala. The accused also appeared, to have no status in Canada, as well. He is neither a Canadian citizen, nor a landed immigrant, according to the information, that I have also received about him. And this may also be another reason, why the police is also protecting him, by changing the order of his name, or reversing it and it is still a ficticious name, as well, in order to protect this man. Documentary evidence, also exist, that would also refute, or contradict, the police claim, that the accused name, is also Idholo Hugues and not the other way around. It has also been suggested, that, the accused, in this case, has also been using, multiple identities and also has documentation, for all of them.

Since the accused, is also before the court, it is now up to the court, to also decipher, all of the information, that currently exist, regarding the accused. I can also say, that, as the victim in this case, I also have hard evidence, to back up my claim, against the accused, in this case, and it is also one of the reasons, that I have also charged, the police officers involved, with obstructing justice, conspiracy and corruption, in regards to the case, for their actions, in the cover-up, regarding the accused, Hugues Idholo Yala.

Note:

JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, J. GAIRY.

His Deliberate Attempt, To Hinder, The Legal Process, More Than Once, Should Also Lead To Judicial Misconduct.

I Have Come Across Many Black Justices Of The Peace, in the Ontario Courts and He is One of the Worst. His $190,000 plus salary per year, with benefits, is also a great incentive for his corruption.
They get many accolades, from their community, for their "achievements", but behind the scenes, some of them, have acted corruptly.

Justice of the Peace, John Gairy. His Actions: Not An Oversight, but Personal Corruption, On His Part.

Justice of the peace Gairy knew what he was doing on July 30, 2012, when he deliberately did not signed the second section of the private information document, regarding the charges against the police officers and also the accused in the July 9, incident involving my animal. And unbeknown st to me at the time, his actions, would also have a profound and also negative effect regarding my case, since the JP at the pre-enquette hearing on August 3, 2012, also refused to hear the case, because the first JP, did not sign and complete the document properly. He also adjourned that hearing to another date in September.

This was not an oversight, but also a deliberate attempt, on his part, to foul up the process, in getting those officers charged. The JP at the pre-enquette hearing, also refused to proceed, with those charges, because he also claimed, that, I was not properly identified, by the first Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, who did not fill out, neither the second, nor the third sections, of the private information, document. That was sufficient for him, not to proceed, he also determined, but he was also not satisfied, with my identification, himself. So he gave me time to replace my driver's license, and to come back in September, for the pre-enquette hearing. Never mind, that, I also had someone, in the courtroom, who could also positively, identified, me, besides the picture identification.

The JP also claimed, that, he could also not identify, the police officers, in my private information. He read aloud their last names, on the court's 'docket list', alongside the word "unknown" marked, beside their names. He also did not want to hear, that, I had also provided, their badge numbers and also their initials, along with their last names, in the information, that I had also filed against them. He read: "Hamilton, unknown, P.C Ross, unknown, etc..." and never mind, that, he was also looking, directly, at the private information, in front of him, that also had, other identifying information, about those police officers, such as their badge numbers and even their full names, for some of them. The Justice of the Peace, claimed that the police officers too, were also not "properly identified". And when I also pointed out to him, about their badge numbers, in the private information, that was also laid. He kept saying, that, I was interrupting him.

I was also caught off guard, because I had never been asked, before, at a pre-enquette hearing, to again provide documentation. That is usually done at the first stage of the process, when the information is being laid, or after the pre-enquette hearing, when process is also issued. Since none was ever issued, in all of my other cases, and though I also should have been prepared, still, I was surprised, that the Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, had also not acted, to complete this process properly and instead had just told me to "Sign here". and "Do you swear, or affirm?". That was it. I even tried to present, my identification again, the second time and he was just not interested. It now explains, why he also did not want, my friend, in the room also, because he, JP Gairy, specifically told the clerk, that, he should also not come in with me, this time.

I presumed that his actions, were also based on the fact, that, I was in the same office, earlier that day and had also identified myself to the previous JP, including bringing also a witness, who knew me personally. And that they had also acted satisfied with this. But again, the fact that JP John Gairy, did not want my friend in the room, the second time, nor did he also requested, my identification, the second time also, yet went ahead and handed in an incomplete document, which shows, that he also knew, what he was doing and had also acted deliberately, in this case.

That was also not the first time, that Justice of the Peace, John Gairy, had also acted corruptly, in my matter. The first time, on a another day, he also acted inappropriately, as well. In fact he acted in reverse. He asked for my identification, then begun to tape the proceeding, before he also realized, that, he was too busy to continue. Showing me the documents on his desk, he commented, that, I should come back, another day and complete what he had apparently already started. He was too busy he said. "Come back another day". And each JP, at the Old City Hall courthouse, has been saying the same thing, until they were told to take the information. Basically to stop telling the public that they were too busy. At least in my case, anyway.

JP John Gairy, also still found a way to f--k up my case. And I want to expose him, as a corrupt Justice of the Peace, in the Ontario court system and that he should also be removed, from his position. Since he also does the public, no good, by his actions. He should also be severely disciplined, because he also knew, exactly, what he was doing. He knew the procedure better than I did, I also presumed, so when he told me to "just sign here" on the two private information, I also did, as well as to affirm, the contents of the documents and then he ended the meeting. I thought that was it. Only later to find out that it was not. That the JP, John Gairy, in fact, was also acting deliberately and was supposed to have also completed the forms, completely, not halfway, by signing all of the them and he also did not. He must have known, that the matter, was also not going to proceed, without this section, also being completed by him.

It was still another attempt, to hinder the charges, against those persons, and especially to prevent the charges, against the police officers, I also believed.
This seemingly innocent action, was in fact, a very thought out attempt, on his part, to continue with his practice, of trying to see that those charges, do not get laid, against those police officers. The first time he also tried to act inappropriately, in the matter, as well as the second time also. I could also see right through his ruse, both times also and the negative consequences, that his actions, also had on my case. It is up to the Ontario Judicial Council, to also determine, if he has also acted, deliberately, in this case.

ANOTHER BLACK, ONTARIO JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, IS IN HOT WATER.


Ontario Justice of the Peace, Errol Massiah.


Oshawa Justice of the Peace, Errol M. Massiah, was found guilty, of sexual misconduct, by the Judicial Council, towards the female court staff. Clerks in his office has also testified, against the Justice of the Peace, for inappropriate conduct towards them, including about their physical appearance.

One clerk has testified, that he has "slapped her on the rear", while another one has also accused him, of making inappropriate comments, towards her. When the clerk inadvertently walked in on him, unbuttoning his shirt, he commented to her, that, "If anytime, you want to see me, with my shirt off, just let me know". He also told another clerk, that, "You have beautiful eyes and I want to gaze into them". He then asked her, what color they were, and if they also changed, with the weather. Still yet another clerk, has also testified, against the Justice of the Peace, that he has commented to her, that, "I could picture clerks, not wearing anything under their gowns", after asking the same clerk, what she was also wearing. The incidents were alleged to have taken place between 2008 and 2010.

For his actions, the Justice of the Peace, was found guilty of sexual harassment and got a 10 day suspension, without pay, but with other benefits, a reprimand and orders to provide signed letters of apology, to the complainants, and also to attend judicial training, for gender sensitivity. Blah, blah, blah. As if those actions are really going to act, as a deterrent, in the future, against this a-- hole.

ON A MORE POSITIVE NOTE,(I THINK), JUSTICE MICHAEL TULLOCH, IS APPOINTED, TO THE ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL.

Justice Michael Tulluch, seem to be a rare breed, among black judges and justices of the peace, practicing in the Ontario courts. In fact, all of Canada. The Brampton, Ontario, Judge, has been appointed, to the Ontario Court of Appeal, in June of 2012 and this also does not seem, to surprise anyone, including me. Okay, he was my former lawyer, so I can attest to his personal integrity and I don't usually show this kindness, to lawyers, but I also think, that he deserved this latest promotion. Mainly, because he has also, benefited, his community, through his efforts, to be a positive role model, by setting an example for others to follow.

As my former lawyer, dealing with the custody case, involving my children, he was also both professional and also empathetic, towards my case, although I also fired him, which he also meekly accepted, at the time. It is important, for lawyers to believe, in their clients and he believed in me. Perhaps, not that much appreciated, by me, at the time. Later, he became a judge in the Brampton court and now he is also being appointed to the Ontario Court of Appeal. I seriously, think that one day, he may also be a judge, in the Supreme Court of Canada and also changed the face of it, for the better. Not just for his community, but also for Canada. Because the Supreme Court of Canada, as I know it right now, is also corrupt. Just asked the many people, who are now, exposing its actions.

THE REGIONAL, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE OFFICE, AT OLD CITY HALL, DID THE RIGHT THING,(FOR ONCE).

The Regional Justice of the Peace office and also the Justice of the Peace, Warren Ralth, at Old City Hall, ordered that the JP's office, take the private information, against the police.

These Justices of the Peace, all claimed that they were too busy, or some other reasons, and therefore could not take the private information, against the police.
Justice of the Peace, G. Gairy, Justice of the Peace, M. Skapinkur, as well as Justice of the Peace, M. Bedard. JP Gairy later took the information, following the order, from the Regional Justice of the Peace Office, that is also located, at the same court house, and from the Justice of the Peace, Warren Ralth, in that office, to do so. He had also previously claimed, that he was also busy, on another occasion, but this time he also complied, with the request, from the office of the senior justice of the peace and also took the private information, against the Toronto police officers.


After making several attempts, to lay my own private charges, against the Toronto police, 14 division, for their role, in the arrest of the man, who was also charged by them, with a misdemeanor charge, for threatening an animal, I was finally able to lay the private information, after being turned away, by the Justices of the Peace, at the old city hall court house. Today, they again refused, to lay the charges, against the police and also against the man, Hugues Idholo, who also now faces, additional charges, of assault with a weapon and also of uttering death threats, regarding the July 9th incident. And with all of them, claiming that they were too busy, and that I should also come back another day, or go to another court, nearby, to lay the charges. I was even told by the clerk, in the JP's office, that the regional Justice of the Peace, was also away and could not see me, when I also made that request. I went to that office at the court house anyway, and was later able to lay the private information, against the police officers.

Some of the misconducts, of JP Marcel Bedard, at the Old City Hall court house.
Justice of the Peace, Marcel Bedard, who has tried to intimidate and also threatened me, with the same charges, that I was also trying to have laid, against the police officers, by claiming, that, "do you know that you could be charged, with obstructing justice yourself?. He also tried to get me to give further evidence, other than what was in my written statement and when I refused, by claiming that it was also improper, for him to insist, that I also give additional information, about the case at that time, including being forced, or coerced to do so, by him, and hence his comments.

The JP, Marcel Bedard, also insisted at that time, to make a decision, on the case. That is, whether to accept the information, against the police officers, based also on its merit, by also claiming, after reading the information, that, there was also insufficient evidence, or information, to lay the private charges against the police. And insisting, also, that I should go into details, about all of the charges, against the police, beginning with the obstructing justice charges and the others. He also accused me of being "uncooperative" and therefore would not take the private information, after I also refused to go into more detail, about the case, other than what was in my written statement. The Justice of the Peace, Marcel Bedard, was also insisting, that I explain to him in detail, about the charges and also the incidences, that has led up to the charges, that I wanted to have laid against the police. Anyone can see that he was going in the wrong direction here.

Legally, a justice of the peace, cannot refuse to take the private information, once you've identified yourself, satisfactorily. Excuses about being busy, is also not a legitimate reason, to refuse a complaint. Since the private information was also about the police, the JPs were doing all that they could, to stop the charges from being laid, against the police officers, even to the point of threatening me, with the charge of obstructing justice, myself, should I also persist, in laying the charges against the police. Thankfully, his ridiculous and also incompetent decision, was later overrided and I was also able to lay the information.

The JP Marcel Bedard, also ordered my friend and witness to this inappropriate conduct, on his part, Nadir Siguencia, out of the room and when I asked the JP, Bedard, if I could also record the proceeding, he also said no. My friend also complied and left the room and immediately after that, the JP, Marcel Beard, also continued with his "interrogation", only to have me flatly refused, to give any other information, since it was also not a full hearing or a trial. Later this was override by another JP, in the senior Justice of the Peace office , who ordered that he, or another JP, in that office, take the information. Next, there is the pre-enquette hearing, which is also scheduled for August 3rd and I am also anticipating, that I will also run into the same kind of obstacle, in trying to have those police officers charged and also prosecuted.